Sherlock Holmes and The Festival of Britain

A recent article on the Baker Street Blog caused me to look through my commonplace book in which I kept my correspondence and cuttings from The Times concerning whether there should be an exhibition dedicated to Holmes, in the public library in St. Marylebone the district of London that includes Baker Street as part of the Festival of Britain in 1951.

It all began when News in Brief in The Times of Friday October 27th 1950 stated that the councillors of St. Marylebone opposed the suggestion by the borough library committee that a Sherlock Holmes exhibition should be staged in the public library as a contribution to the Festival. The leader of the council said that the borough had “many things to show off about without Sherlock Holmes” [1]  (click on any of the cuttings to see slightly enlarged versions).

[1]

I was moved to write to Alderman Dean but instead wrote to the editor of The Times the same day [2]. I doubted that Holmes would have seen the article and also doubted that he would have risen to his own defence. I believed that many of the visitors expected from abroad would find such an exhibition of interest and I suggested, with indignation, that they should reconsider their decision.

[2]

This provoked a good deal of interest with Councillor Sharp inviting me to a meeting of the library committee the following Tuesday [3]. Sharp informed me that no final decision had been made and asked if any of Holmes personal effects might form the basis of just such an exhibition and indicated that he might have been one of Holmes’ clients and that he already possessed one of his violins!

[3]

Although Councillor Vernon [4] says he supported the idea of giving Holmes his appropriate place as an illustrious former resident of the borough, a letter from a Mr Back [5] suggests that Vernon “spoke so slightingly” of Holmes. Back even suggested that I try to persuade Holmes to open the exhibition which was about as likely as the life-size statue of Silver Blaze that Back suggested.

[4] [6]

[5]

Arthur Wontner, one of the actors who played Holmes at the cinema also added his support [6] and Mycroft got involved but only to point out that he thought my memory was failing. [7] One of our former clients wrote to say that she thought my letter was a forgery as she believed that my first name was James [8] and a colleague also added support. [9]

[7] [8] [9]

The following day I was surprised to find that Mrs Hudson had also written to The Times [10] castigating Madame Tussaud’s round the corner for not having our effigies amongst its exhibits.

[10]

Also in that day’s edition it was finally confirmed that a Sherlock Holmes Exhibition would be mounted in library as part of the Festival. [11] They mistakenly refer to Conan Doyle as Holmes’ chronicler rather than as my literary agent.

 

[11]

In a letter to The Times on November 4th, Oscar Meunier, who made the bust of Holmes that was used to trap Sebastian Moran, and was, by then, living in London, stated that Holmes had asked him to ensure that no likeness of either of us or any of those he brought to justice should be perpetrated by waxen images. [12]

[12]

Nevertheless I conveyed the good news about the exhibition to Holmes personally that day along with the copies of the cuttings from The Times that I have included here. He was touched by this tribute but alas many of the relics of our cases that many hoped would form part of the exhibition were destroyed in that mysterious and disastrous fire shortly after the end of the war.

[13]

In reporting in The Times that Holmes had warmed to the idea, I also replied to Mycroft and Kate Whitney. [13] I was surprised to see that Lestrade had added his voice to the chorus of approval though reading it now more carefully I see that the inspector is getting his own back. [14]

[14]

The Times editorial of November 7th sums the whole story up rather well and adds that should the Marylebone councillors feel in the future that they are “getting a little over-confident” in their powers that someone should kindly whisper “Baker Street” in their ears in a similar way to how Holmes asked me to whisper “Norbury” in his! [15]

[15]

But the final word I will leave with Dame Jean Conan Doyle, dear Arthur’s daughter, who offered to provide much material for the exhibition. [16]

[16]

Comments

2 Responses

  1. Miss Neve R says:

    Doctor Watson – do you not perchance see the hand of Moriarty in these curious and murky attempts to deny Mr Holmes his rightful place in history?

    • The Good Doctor says:

      Ever since Holmes remarked (as I recorded in The Final Problem) that Moriarty “is the organizer of half that is evil and of nearly all that is undetected in this great city” many have assumed he is behind every wrong-doing but I think this was too minor for his gang to have been involved in some 60 years after their leader’s demise.

      JHW

Leave a Reply

RSS Feed